Blog Layout

What is the connection between Family Courts and Domestic Abuse?

Institute for Child Custody Advocacy • May 05, 2022

Coercive control is a strategic form of trauma.

Studies have shown that when parents allege abusive behavior in their relationship, they often lose custody of their children. Tactics go beyond physical abuse and can include intimidation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, financial blackmail, and malicious parental behaviors, to name a few.

 

Couples who end up in the Family Court System often have at least one abusive party involved. It is a self-determining process, because, in most cases, with two well-meaning people, an equitable settlement is made before ever entering the Family Court System. 

 

Coercive control is an act or a pattern of acts of assault, threats, humiliation, intimidation, or other abuse that is used to harm, punish, or frighten survivors.


Signs of coercive control include:

1. Removal of economic independence 

2. Isolation from friends, family, and religion 

3. Erosion of self-esteem through words and actions

 And if the survivor still has the courage to leave, the abuser could…

4. Try to take children away or turn children against their parent 

 

Domestic violence groups work hard to address the first three abuse factors mentioned above. The Institute for Child Custody Advocacy’s primary purpose is to focus solely on the fourth.

 

Join the fight to create parental protections around people while they rebuild their professional and personal lives.

 

The Family Court System should not be weaponized. No one should have to endure the pain of an abusive co-parent willing to turn the children into a cruel form of currency— given as a reward for exhibiting certain desired behaviors and removed as a punishment for perceived (or actual) grievances.

Share Our Message

By Bridget Neal 15 Jun, 2022
Introduction
By Bridget Neal 13 Jun, 2022
Louisiana legislators have recognized the many structural failures within the family court system. In a rare display of bipartisanship and mutual agreement, both chambers of the Louisiana Legislature adopted, identical in intention, resolutions pledging their commitment to protecting the parent-child bond and constitutional right to parent. Senate Resolution 186 (SR186) and the House Resolution 228 (HR228), both “urge and request the Louisiana State Law Institute (LSLI) to review (state) laws, rules, regulations, policies, and procedures related to mental health evaluations used in child custody and visitation proceedings.“ LSLI is a legislative advisory body, housed at LSU, that researches questions of law and then makes recommendations to legislators. This joint resolution crucially expands the scope of inquiry beyond specific credentials for mental health evaluations to the application of legal standards and the parental protections afforded by the constitution. Notably, these resolutions illuminate the importance of establishing an equitable co-parenting relationship and the role of the child custody evaluation in establishing the co-parenting power dynamics. These resolutions outline that the child custody evaluation should encourage collaborative co-parenting while discouraging approaches that strip parental and custodial rights unless doing so complies with enacted domestic violence laws. Louisiana legislators seem to understand that the relationship between the parents is the primary factor that truly frames childhood experiences and memories.
By Bridget Neal 08 Jun, 2022
Where The Wheels of Justice Grind You Down
More Posts
Share by: